![]() |
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I am looking at building up an SG Bass replica through Warmoth.com But I noticed that their SG body is the same width as the p-bass, etc. The thing I love about the SG's is how thin they are. Could someone measure their bass body and let me know how thick it is? Gibsons site didn't give dimensions (that I could find). And if you have an extra minute and a scale, how much does your bass weigh? Thanks.
-Joe |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
My slot head has to be around 1 1/2" thick
__________________
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu ... d=41630687 |
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
The EB0/3 basses were 1 5/16" throughout their production (according to all catalogues 1962-197
. No variation whatsoever. I always assumed the post '72s were thicker (but never measured them) - there you go. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thanks for your help!
|
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
The post-72s might be a tiny bit thicker, but I think the heavier mahogany and fewer body contours may just make it seem so.
In any case, you can't really get a replica from Warmoth. Even if they would make it thinner for you (and I doubt they will),and even if you gluedin the neck, it has a Fender neck pocket. The neck and string spacing would have to be wider, etc. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I can't say that I'm surprised. Catalogs are put out by admen, not musicians.
It continues to this day.The LP Faded I just sent back has 2 volume and 2 tone controls, and it's about 1.6" at the nut. But the description at MF (which no doubt came directly from Gibson) says it has 2 volume and 1 tone and a 1.5" nut width. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
I was wondering why you would make one, when in the end it will end up possibly costing more than a real one, but end up being worth, less, than what you put into it?
What is it you want that the countless Gibson/Epi versions don't have? Just curious?
__________________
http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fu ... d=41630687 |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|